Thursday, March 3, 2011

Do Government Spending Cuts Reduce Growth?

We can test this proposition using the stimulus wind-down over the past couple of quarters. The blue squares in the chart below are measures of actual inflation-adjusted government spending growth and real GDP growth. It looks like the economy grew more as government spending was cut after the stimulus peaked.

(For an explanation of the red and green hypotheticals shown in the chart, click here).

You might argue that government spending cut back only when the economy began to recover for other reasons, but I see two problems with that argument:

  • the wind-down of the ARRA "stimulus" was set two years ago when the law was passed. By what miracle did the stimulus designers get the timing exactly correct, while at the same time were wildly off on how deep the recession would ultimately prove to be?
  • If you believe that government spending really does increase GDP, what exactly is helped the economy endure the end-of-stimulus spending cuts by actually growing faster that it did a year ago when stimulus spending was peaking?


TGGP said...

Your second bullet point is awkward to parse. Replace "is" with "has". And consider breaking it up into multiple sentences, perhaps first saying the economy has endured, and in the next sentence point out that it has not merely endured but grown faster.

Qaiser said...

I am much thankful to you for sharing this really very very informative post. Can you post a list about Top Ten Universities of the World?

Qaiser Khan

Morgan said...

As a U of C grad, I can only say your ideological bias shows through more clearly than your analytics

Anonymous said...

have being learning alot just by reading your post. Thanks for providing quality content on your blog suntrust online banking | suntrust online banking login

muzammal khan said...

Even if lack of career insurance policy did not prevent an individual from working, the net effect of the system. bubblegum casting