|
Figure 19-3 from Chicago Price Theory |
|
From the 2019 Economic Report of the President |
(the second derivative of the after-AI demand curve is part of the discussion in both sources).
Economic issue analyzed by CEA |
CPT pages |
ACA employer mandate |
75 |
- |
75 |
|
Agency Compliance with Circular A-4 |
131 |
- |
132 |
|
Artificial Intelligence and the labor market |
120 |
- |
121 |
|
Artificial Intelligence and the labor
market |
132 |
- |
133 |
|
Artificial Intelligence and the labor
market |
147 |
- |
148 |
|
Artificial Intelligence and the labor
market |
176 |
- |
179 |
|
Artificial Intelligence and the labor
market |
182 |
- |
183 |
|
Artificial Intelligence and the labor
market |
186 |
- |
186 |
|
Artificial Intelligence and the labor
market |
189 |
- |
191 |
|
Artificial Intelligence and the labor
market |
195 |
- |
196 |
|
CEA's sample of 20 deregulatory actions |
7 |
- |
9 |
|
CEA's sample of 20 deregulatory actions |
59 |
- |
61 |
|
CEA's sample of 20 deregulatory actions |
131 |
- |
132 |
|
CEA's sample of 20 deregulatory actions |
135 |
- |
138 |
|
CEA's sample of 20 deregulatory actions |
140 |
- |
144 |
|
Corporate-income taxation |
184 |
- |
185 |
|
Corporate-income taxation |
185 |
- |
186 |
|
Corporate-income taxation |
210 |
- |
210 |
|
Green New Deal |
116 |
- |
119 |
|
Green New Deal |
131 |
- |
132 |
|
Health insurance deregulation |
59 |
- |
61 |
|
Health insurance deregulation |
102 |
- |
103 |
|
Health insurance deregulation |
131 |
- |
132 |
|
Health insurance deregulation |
150 |
- |
150 |
|
HHS Removal of Safe Harbor for Rebates |
66 |
- |
72 |
|
HHS Removal of Safe Harbor for Rebates |
140 |
- |
144 |
|
Highly socialist countries |
135 |
- |
138 |
|
Highly socialist countries |
150 |
- |
150 |
|
Macro effects of trade policy |
32 |
- |
32 |
|
Macro effects of trade policy |
176 |
- |
179 |
|
Measuring Rx drug prices |
48 |
- |
55 |
|
Measuring Rx drug prices |
55 |
- |
57 |
|
Medicare for All |
157 |
- |
159 |
|
Medicare for All |
160 |
- |
161 |
|
Medicare for All |
168 |
- |
170 |
|
Medicare for All |
176 |
- |
179 |
|
Medicare for All |
209 |
- |
209 |
|
Opportunity Zones |
98 |
- |
99 |
|
Pandemic Innovation Values |
206 |
- |
206 |
|
Telecommunications deregulation |
7 |
- |
9 |
|
Telecommunications deregulation |
79 |
- |
81 |
|
Telecommunications deregulation |
102 |
- |
103 |
|
Telecommunications deregulation |
140 |
- |
144 |
|
Telecommunications deregulation |
150 |
- |
150 |
|
The "doubling effect" of switching from reg to dereg |
106 |
- |
107 |
|
The cumulative impact of regulation (conceptual) |
116 |
- |
119 |
|
The cumulative impact of regulation
(conceptual) |
120 |
- |
121 |
|
The cumulative impact of regulation
(conceptual) |
131 |
- |
132 |
|
The cumulative impact of regulation
(conceptual) |
132 |
- |
133 |
|
The cumulative impact of regulation
(conceptual) |
135 |
- |
138 |
|
The cumulative impact of regulation
(conceptual) |
147 |
- |
148 |
|
The cumulative impact of regulation
(conceptual) |
176 |
- |
179 |
|
The opioid epidemic |
7 |
- |
9 |
|
The opioid epidemic |
44 |
- |
45 |
|
The opioid epidemic |
66 |
- |
72 |
|
The opioid epidemic |
74 |
- |
75 |
|
The opioid epidemic |
128 |
- |
129 |
|
The opioid epidemic |
131 |
- |
132 |
|
The opioid epidemic |
135 |
- |
138 |
|
The opioid epidemic |
204 |
- |
206 |
|
USMCA |
96 |
- |
98 |
|
Wage growth |
48 |
- |
55 |
|
[redacted regulatory impact analysis] |
48 |
- |
55 |
|
[redacted regulatory impact analysis] |
157 |
- |
159 |
|
[redacted regulatory impact analysis] |
186 |
- |
188 |
|
[redacted trade deregulation] |
131 |
- |
132 |
|
[redacted trade deregulation] |
135 |
- |
138 |
|
I suspect that this is historically unusual. For example, the neoclassical growth model (standard training in Economics PhD programs and on pages 176-196 of
Chicago Price Theory) had
never been mentioned in an
Economic Report of the President until 2018. In 2018 and 2019 that model was used to address several policy questions, especially those cited above.
When I went to the Post Office website the cheapest rate I could find for send a 4 pound 6 ounce 12 inch cube from Fairfax, Virginia to China was $70. The rate from Fairfax to Anchorage was about $23. I lived abroad for many years and have never heard of such low international rates.
ReplyDeletehttps://postcalc.usps.com/Calculator/MailServices?
China rates:
ReplyDeleteMail Services
Package, weight 4 lb 6 oz (1.984 kg) to China
Price charts and complete information for China
Global Express Guaranteed® (GXG)**
Global Express Guaranteed® (GXG)**
Max. length 46", width 35", height 46" and max. length plus girth combined 108"
Value of contents can not exceed $2,499.00
See Service Guide Before Mailing
Min. length 9-1/2", height 5-1/2"
Select a Delivery Option Expected Delivery Day Retail Click-N-Ship®
Normal Delivery Time 1 - 3 business days to many major markets $202.65 $202.65
USPS GXG™ Envelopes**
USPS GXG™ Envelopes**
USPS-Produced regular size cardboard envelope (12-1/2" x 9-1/2"), the legal-sized cardboard envelope (15" x 9-1/2") and the GXG Tyvek envelope (15-1/2" x 12-1/2")
Value of contents can not exceed $2,499.00
See Service Guide Before Mailing
Select a Delivery Option Expected Delivery Day Retail Click-N-Ship®
Normal Delivery Time 1 - 3 business days to many major markets $150.65 $150.65
Priority Mail Express International™
Priority Mail Express International™
Max. length 60", max. length plus girth combined 108"
(Calculate Guaranteed Date)
Select a Delivery Option Scheduled Delivery Day Retail Click-N-Ship®
Normal Delivery Time 3 - 5 business days to many major markets $92.40 $92.40
Priority Mail International®
Priority Mail International®
Max. length 42", max. length plus girth combined 79"
Select a Delivery Option Expected Delivery Day Retail Click-N-Ship®
Normal Delivery Time 6 - 10 business days to many major markets2,3 $70.00 $70.00