A recent study reiterated the conclusion that population growth ought to be controlled in order to combat global warming, and other world problems. The authors of studies like these have exaggerated the benefits of population control, because they ignore some of the significant economic benefits of large populations -- in particular, the effect of population on the rate of technical change.
Some may argue that population spurs innovation only when the population in question is "adequately" educated, and that population needs to be controlled to achieve that adequate education. That's and interesting hypothesis, and worthy of further investigation, but let's not ignore what's already been published on this subject. Harvard's Professor Kremer wrote
"high population spurs technical change ... [historically] societies with larger initial populations have had faster technological change ...."
Michael Kremer (1993), "Population Growth and Technological Change: One Million B.C. to 1990," Quarterly Journal of Economics 108:3 (August), pp. 681-716.
In case you're wondering, the populations considered by Professor Kremer were actually LESS educated than the populations that some want to control today.
[Interestingly, the link above proves that at least some population control advocates are aware of the Kremer study, and have deliberately chosen to ignore it in the recent blogosphere debate]
Some may argue that population spurs innovation only when the population in question is "adequately" educated, and that population needs to be controlled to achieve that adequate education. That's and interesting hypothesis, and worthy of further investigation, but let's not ignore what's already been published on this subject. Harvard's Professor Kremer wrote
"high population spurs technical change ... [historically] societies with larger initial populations have had faster technological change ...."
Michael Kremer (1993), "Population Growth and Technological Change: One Million B.C. to 1990," Quarterly Journal of Economics 108:3 (August), pp. 681-716.
In case you're wondering, the populations considered by Professor Kremer were actually LESS educated than the populations that some want to control today.
[Interestingly, the link above proves that at least some population control advocates are aware of the Kremer study, and have deliberately chosen to ignore it in the recent blogosphere debate]
If the property cycle is to be linked to fundamentals, then it must be explained why. bubblegum casting
ReplyDeleteThe husband will come to me and ask me to convince his wife to use a method bubblegum casting
ReplyDeleteGenerally, these changes in trend with the dollar, because of its status as a reserve currency, are not sudden so you just need to watch the trend develop. Bennet and Company
ReplyDeleteDue in part to improved requirement for ethanol and sugarcane shortages, Brazil's govt lately declared in its yearly farming plan for 2012-2013 that lovely sorghum would be regarded a ideal plants. TUBE
ReplyDeleteThe Animal grabs up with his expected ‘pursuer’, but too delayed, and the dad passes away unforgiving, while kid continues to be unloved, and is remaining to indicate on the disaster of his own unpleasant existence. car loans for you
ReplyDeleteForced transfers from taxpayers to debt holders. When the burden on taxpayers becomes too great, there are real problems-- disincentives to work as you have identified in other posts. the venus factor pdf
ReplyDelete