tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7539577136486286096.post388670951273767399..comments2024-03-28T02:46:41.090-05:00Comments on Supply and Demand (in that order): Flashback: Model of Zero MultiplierCasey B. Mulliganhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03317454408275318282noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7539577136486286096.post-32853025096324256562010-07-10T14:13:37.327-05:002010-07-10T14:13:37.327-05:00Robert Barro seems to agree with me, since 0.8 is ...Robert Barro seems to agree with me, since 0.8 is a "dampener":<br />http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2009/01/multipliers_and_diminishing_returns/TGGPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11017651009634767649noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7539577136486286096.post-92157170678791661432010-07-09T22:06:34.273-05:002010-07-09T22:06:34.273-05:00I would think a multiplier of zero means that the ...I would think a multiplier of zero means that the expenditures bring zero value. A multiplier of one usually means having no effect in math.TGGPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11017651009634767649noreply@blogger.com